The Folly of Fools

A while back, Glenn Beck authored a book called, "Arguing with Idiots."  In it, he quotes the arguments (talking points) of the extreme left, right, and other ideologues and then responds to them with what he considered reason and logic.  Focusing as much on the 'funny' as the truth as he understands it, he employed a great deal of condescension for the 'idiots.'  It could be argued the 'idiots' provide the fodder for their own character assassination.  I don't think Glenn is proficient at or even concerned about arguing with 'idiots' in a way that comes off as (agapeo) loving as described in my "Other Centered" article, 'making knowledge acceptable' but his intention IS for the betterment of society and of the 'idiot's' own welfare.  However, he has hit on the one correct tactical response to a fool's argument.  With all the authority of an adult caretaker of an undisciplined child, insist on right, good, reason, truth speaking and accountability. For my part, the Christian is cautioned not to use the term 'fool' in condemnation of a person.  Matthew 5:22  "Rhacca" or 'worthless' could be translated into 'dangerous' and 'deadly.'  That being the case, charges of 'fool' interpreted as dangerous to our culture could literally wind up with death penalties for ignorance and honest mistakes and anyway, God never intended we clean the culture by death penalty for ordinary folly.  Everyone is foolish.  It must be so, because all sin is foolish self destruction and yet, everybody sins.  Literally, every person on earth is deserving of the death penalty in that case and what did He hang on the cross for?  Therefore, Christ told us we would be in danger of hellfire for character assassination.   In the circumstance of arguing with a fool, if one is not able to be authoritative, he appears as foolish as the fool.  However, if he is able to be authoritative, whatever remains of the fool's good reputation is destroyed by his own mouth in comparison to the authority of truth.   Our Lord did not condemn the assessment of a person’s character, but the assassination of one’s character.  We're supposed to assess who is and is not a fool for several reasons, but again with the caution not to go around charging fools and condemning them, justly or not.  The first reason we must assess the recipient's condition is for self preservation.  Fools are dangerous critters.  They hate and lie and slander and worse, frequently with no more incentive than an inherent blood lust.   The second reason is to measure our answer according to their ability to receive it.  The more immature and undisciplined the mind, the more care required in presenting the truth to make it acceptable or palatable.  It's literally like gaining the trust and respect of a child and leading them to reason out truth for themselves.  "Foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child; The rod of discipline will remove it far from him" Proverbs (22:15).  The opening of a closed mind is usually a matter of respect and eventually, trust.  Some of the reasons a mind is closed is based on prejudice or judging in advance of investigation.  Some prejudice is based on real experience of abusive authority.  Still other prejudice is unwarranted, self serving wickedness.   The third reason we must assess the recipient's spiritual condition is to further meet them in the area of their need.  A drug addict needs assistance in kicking his habit while an Anarchist ideologue needs a swift kick in the pants.  No? Okay, maybe its life coaching, but the kick would make ME feel better.  (that wasn't other centered was it?) Thus it is that I cautiously step up onto the soapbox to laud arguments with fools to expose their folly.  My own abilities to articulate the truth to fools is far from where it should be at my age or even at my spiritual age. (the point at which I began to accept and employ the precepts the Bible promotes until now.)  As noted again, in my "Other Centered" article, God provides the ability at the right time and any attempt outside of that supernatural embodiment of His power to love in Agape', is nothing if not getting in the way of His agenda.  At the same time, I am to be prepared to give every man an answer for the hope that is within me.  In that endeavor, I try to be keep up with current events and historical knowledge as well as studying the Bible under the tutelage of the Holy Spirit. In the spirit of objective truth, lets examine what behaviors exemplify folly.  It isn't what we've been led to think of as folly by Hollywood movies and slapstick humorists.  That's simply a projection of imaginary well intentioned oafs.  The traits of the foolish are listed in the 26th Chapter of Proverbs and they ain't well intentioned or oafish in most cases.  In fact, many fools can argue a blue streak and with the current state of the state-run schools promoting anti-wisdom mantras like, "Don't judge people" and "Truth is subjective" fools are purposefully filled with pride and feel justified in loudly and obnoxiously projecting their foolish opinions on the rest of the culture.  In my mind, that means we Christians have a huge task ahead of us to combat the misinformation in the form of self deluded popular opinion presented every bit as authoritative as revealed objective truth.  If we're not too far behind the curve of mass delusion, perhaps we can pull our culture back from the brink of self destruction.  On that score, I agree whole-heartedly with Glenn Beck.  I also agree with Ayn Rand on at least one point.  Truth must be preached over and over again, constantly for the express purpose of defeating harmful ideas. eg. 'social justice'  Truth must be intellectually defended from the ravages of self delusion and evil manipulators.  Now lets dig in to the meat of revealed truth. << Proverbs 26 >> New American Standard Bible Similitudes, Instructions 1Like snow in summer and like rain in harvest,          So honor is not fitting for a fool. No one is prepared for a cold day in the summer, neither is anyone prepared to honor fools.  Rain on a crop ripe for harvest delays the harvest at best and ruins it entirely at worst (with mildew or stripping winds and hail)  So is the building up of a fool's pride harmful to the community. 2Like a sparrow in its flitting, like a swallow in its flying,          So a curse without cause does not alight. Blessing and cursing require the employment of faith.  Curses require the addition of the believer's righteousness and evil deeds or unrighteousness on the part of the recipient.  Contrarily, the enemy curses the righteous and the unrighteous, the former any way he can and the latter with deceitful promises in an effort to get them to do his bidding. 3A whip is for the horse, a bridle for the donkey,          And a rod for the back of fools. To make any beneficial use of the animals, often they must be given an incentive to do as instructed.  Similarly, with fools an authority figure must find and provide immediate incentives to the fool to behave as necessary to benefit the community or even themselves. 4Do not answer a fool according to his folly,          Or you will also be like him. Emotional responses or arguments without forethought bring your character and reputation down to the level of the fool.   You wind up impressing no one and improving nothing.  Your behavior is indistinguishable from the fool's. 5Answer a fool as his folly deserves,          That he not be wise in his own eyes. There is nothing so destructive to a society as the pride of a fool.  He goes about spreading his fool's agenda until challenged by an authoritative speaker of the truth whereupon his foolishness is exposed and his agenda scrapped. 6He cuts off his own feet and drinks violence          Who sends a message by the hand of a fool. The author didn't have a word like 'handicaps' so he described a literal handicap (self inflicted) and compares this self destruction and public danger by his willingness to place responsibility and trust in the hands of a fool. 7Like the legs which are useless to the lame,          So is a proverb in the mouth of fools. A fool is incapable of discerning wisdom and truth.  He will misinterpret the proverb and thus the proverb being misapplied is comparable to dead weight as opposed to useful appendages. 8Like one who binds a stone in a sling,          So is he who gives honor to a fool. A stone swung in a sling that does not release it's load will continue it's round until it collides with the wielder.  In other words, "you'll knock your eye out, kid!"  No society can afford the presence of a proud fool.  Honoring him will increase his pride and empower him to spread his folly into others. 9Like a thorn which falls into the hand of a drunkard,          So is a proverb in the mouth of fools. A drunk is more susceptible to auto responses and one such natural reaction to something touching the skin of the hand is to automatically close the hand on the object that strikes it.  Closing the hand on a thorn is going to force that thorn to pierce the skin.  That's what a proverb does to the fool's character and reputation through his repeating it out of proper context. 10Like an archer who wounds everyone,          So is he who hires a fool or who hires those who pass by. This proverb reminds me of the old cartoon with Injun Joe in which one of his compatriots would always be behind another Indian during battles.  When he let fly his arrow it always conked his friend in the back of the head.  The employer is charged with choosing industrious and virtuous people to hire.  Without foreknowledge of their character, he is taking a great chance in hiring a foolish character.  The foolish character is dangerous to be near, especially in a work environment where people are focusing their attentions on their own duties instead of the dangers created by the fool. 11Like a dog that returns to its vomit          Is a fool who repeats his folly. Yes, dogs actually do eat their vomit and yes, fools actually do repeat the same mistakes over and over again as if without memory or reason. 12Do you see a man wise in his own eyes?          There is more hope for a fool than for him. Troubling information that fools are not the worst society has to offer.  Worse is a man unable or unwilling to seek or even accept correction in his behavior and purpose. 13The sluggard says, “There is a lion in the road!          A lion is in the open square!” Note the terms switch from fool to sluggard but the theme continues.  He will lie to make excuses for not doing what he knows he should be doing. 14As the door turns on its hinges,          So does the sluggard on his bed. He quite literally groans as he rolls over just like a door on squeaky hinges. 15The sluggard buries his hand in the dish;          He is weary of bringing it to his mouth again. It's a pretty extreme case when a person cannot be bothered to feed himself.  These few sluggard proverbs are meant to exaggerate the case so the sluggard can laugh at his own ways and therefore accept correction. 16The sluggard is wiser in his own eyes          Than seven men who can give a discreet answer. Again, but this time not for humor but for force to point out his unwillingness to be corrected.  The seven men wise enough to provide discretion are able to measure their answers to make knowledge acceptable to the recipient. 17Like one who takes a dog by the ears          Is he who passes by and meddles with strife not belonging to him. You have to be blind to the consequences, self destructive, looking for a fight, or supernaturally tasked and empowered to insert yourself into another's self destruction. 18Like a madman who throws          Firebrands, arrows and death, Ever heard the phrase, "Looking for trouble?"  This seeker will find his goal in short order.  A prime example comes to mind that has lately made the news.  "Suicide by cop."  A perpetrator of crimes is relentless and unswerving in his attempt to challenge the police with deadly force until they're forced to act in preservation of innocent life, their own or bystanders. 19So is the man who deceives his neighbor,          And says, “Was I not joking?” A poor disguise or a thinly veiled ill intention.  This phrase is so prevalent in present day culture it needs no further interpretation.  "It was a joke!  Don't get mad!" 20For lack of wood the fire goes out,          And where there is no whisperer, contention quiets down. Contention is not the normal state of relationships.  It requires the fuel of an evil spirit to keep stirring up relational problems. 21Like charcoal to hot embers and wood to fire,          So is a contentious man to kindle strife. Compares the fuel and the fire to evil spirits and unwitting people.  The wicked want to destroy relationships. 22The words of a whisperer are like dainty morsels,          And they go down into the innermost parts of the body. Tempting is the drama of contention to boredom and the strife of contention easily finds the core of our relationships. 23Like an earthen vessel overlaid with silver dross          Are burning lips and a wicked heart. Once one becomes attracted to drama, they are unworthy to keep company with, for seeking harm to the community. 24He who hates disguises it with his lips,          But he lays up deceit in his heart. The malcontent knows their character is unattractive so they attempt to hide it while simultaneously planning and acting out wickedness. 25When he speaks graciously, do not believe him,          For there are seven abominations in his heart. Once you recognize this character, just know their intention is to do harm to your relationships and murder your character and reputation. 26Though his hatred covers itself with guile,          His wickedness will be revealed before the assembly. Eventually, the truth always comes out and it does so in a public way no matter how well camouflaged. 27He who digs a pit will fall into it,          And he who rolls a stone, it will come back on him. Evil people get caught in their own traps.  They cannot discern their self destruction nor it's cause frequently blaming the innocent, but the discerning spirit recognizes the handiwork as being their own. 28A lying tongue hates those it crushes,          And a flattering mouth works ruin. Helps to define hatred as ill intentioned.  Flattery undeserved, has an agenda and it is never set for wholly beneficial purposes.  It is designed to win the favor of one who can be used to do evil by proxy. Other verses scattered around the book of Proverbs include: Leave the presence of a fool, Or you will not discern words of knowledge (14:7). The proactive Christian is tasked with pre-purposing his mind and will to be subject to one influence.  That of the Holy Spirit.  Prior to Jesus' ascension after having defeated death and Hades, the faithful did not have these tools.  Even so, to this day we are repeatedly cautioned to guard our hearts from wicked desires and evil temptations. Let a man meet a bear robbed of her cubs, Rather than a fool in his folly (17:12). If you have not prepared your heart for this fool's specific folly, you may be subject to his influence.  That one encounter can be enough to send you off track for the rest of your life affecting your family and everyone you ever rub shoulders with. Drive out the scoffer, and contention will go out, Even strife and dishonor will cease (22:10). Echoes 26:21-28 but most specifically 26:23 and provides the more proactive "Drive out" the fool, referred to in this case as the scoffer and in verse 9:7,8 counters the scoffer with the wise. Foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child; The rod of discipline will remove it far from him (22:15). The child is still open enough to respect and trust the loving righteous authority in their lives to be corrected.  It may frequently not seem so, but the consistent loving and righteous authority figure will inculcate a deep and lasting effect. He who corrects a scoffer gets dishonor for himself, And he who reproves a wicked man gets insults for himself. Do not reprove a scoffer, lest he hate you, Reprove a wise man, and he will love you (9:7-8). This is self preserving wisdom.  It prefers the open mind to the closed mind.  Jesus encouraged every believer to go to all the world with the Gospel.  He forewarned His disciples that they would be hated and persecuted for His name's sake.  This call to 'follow Him' specifically includes the examples He set on the cross, eg. death.  The dishonor stated above is lost at the point of 'other centeredness' and 'other concern' revealed in our personal sacrifice for the sake of the lost and self destructing fools.  Paul described himself as a 'fool' for Christ because the 'wisdom' of Christians is folly in the eyes of the secular world, not for lack of Christian reason or logic, but because of the fools' disregard of reason and logic. Okay; enough.  If you want more, keep going but you're going to have to look them up and contemplate them under the tutelage of the Holy Spirit yourselves.  Let me just close by saying, the issue of folly and wisdom is one of the heart.  You cannot really reason folly out of the fool, neither can you teach him not to be a fool, you'd be hard pressed to beat the folly out of a fool.  No, in God's time, with loving kindness present the Good news of God's accomplishment on our behalf.  Until the fool is prepared to receive that fundamental truth, he will reject your proof and resent your insinuation that he is at fault for anything.  By the way, Christians are certainly not immune to folly, thus the warnings to avoid the fool in his folly.  Its contagious.  You are however, empowered by the Holy Spirit to discern truth and you should proactively use the time at hand to study the Bible for pre-confrontation preparation against the day you are stuck in an elevator for hours with a wicked fool, or faced with the folly of your teens on a cross-country drive.  I'll have to share the situation God put me in to give me the incentive to study the stuff He wanted me to study in His Word, someday.  Either of the above situations would have been preferable. Desire realized is sweet to the soul, But it is an abomination to fools to depart from evil (13:19). Doing wickedness is like sport to a fool; And so is wisdom to a man of understanding (10:23). Fools mock at sin, But among the upright there is good will (14:9). The lips of the righteous feed many, But fools die for lack of understanding (10:21) Why is there a price in the hand of a fool to buy wisdom, When he has no sense? (17:16). A scoffer seeks wisdom, and finds none, But knowledge is easy to him who has understanding (14:6). Wisdom is too high for a fool, He will not open his mouth in the gate (24:7). The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; Fools despise wisdom and instruction (1:7). The mind of the intelligent seeks knowledge, But the mouth of fools feeds on folly (15:14). A fool does not delight in understanding, But only in revealing his own mind (18:2). Do not speak in the hearing of a fool, For he will despise the wisdom of your words (23:9). Wisdom is in the presence of the one who has understanding, But the eyes of a fool are on the ends of the earth (17:24). There is precious treasure and oil in the dwelling of the wise, But a foolish man swallows it up (21:30). A fool’s vexation is known at once, But a prudent man conceals dishonor (12:16). A fool always loses his temper, But a wise man holds it back (29:11). A prudent man conceals knowledge, But the heart of fools proclaims folly (12:23). The tongue of the wise makes knowledge acceptable, But the mouth of fools spouts folly (15:2).

He who conceals hatred has lying lips, And he who spreads slander is a fool (10:18).

The wisdom of the prudent is to understand his way, But the folly of fools is deceit (14:8).

Better is a poor man who walks in his integrity Than he who is perverse in speech and is a fool (19:1).

The tongue of the wise makes knowledge acceptable, But the mouth of fools spouts folly (15:2).

The lips of the wise spread knowledge, But the hearts of fools are not so (15:7)

Because they hated knowledge, And did not choose the fear of the Lord. They would not accept my counsel, They spurned all my reproof So they shall eat of the fruit of their own way, And be satiated with their own devices. For the waywardness of the naive shall kill them, And the complacency of fools shall destroy them (1:29-32).

A fool rejects his father’s discipline, But he who regards reproof is prudent (15:5).

A scoffer does not love one who reproves him, He will not go to the wise (15:12).

A rebuke goes deeper into one who has understanding Than a hundred blows into a fool (17:10).

Though you pound a fool in a mortar with a pestle along with crushed grain, Yet his folly will not depart from him (27:22).

Scorners set a city aflame, But wise men turn away anger (29:8).

The devising of folly is sin, And the scoffer is an abomination to men (24:9).

The way of the fool is right in his own eyes, But a wise man is he who listens to counsel (12:15).

He who trusts in his own heart is a fool, But he who walks wisely will be delivered (28:26).

Trust in the Lord with all your heart, And do not lean on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge Him, And He will make your paths straight. Do not be wise in your own eyes; Fear the Lord and turn away from evil (3:5-7).

Leave the presence of a fool, Or you will not discern words of knowledge (14:7).

When a wise man has a controversy with a foolish man, The foolish man either rages or laughs, and there is no rest (29:9).

In the mouth of the foolish is a rod for his back, But the lips of the wise will preserve them (14:3).

A fool’s lips bring strife, And his mouth calls for blows. A fool’s mouth is his ruin, And his lips are the snare of his soul (18:6-7).

Luxury is not fitting for a fool; Much less for a slave to rule over princes (19:10).

Strike a scoffer and the naive may become shrewd, But reprove one who has understanding and he will gain knowledge (19:25)

“How long, 0 naive ones, will you love simplicity? And scoffers delight themselves in scoffing, And fools hate knowledge? Turn to my reproof, Behold, I will pour out my spirit on you; I will make my words known to you (1:22-24).

“Come, eat of my food, And drink of the wine I have mixed. Forsake your folly and live, And proceed in the way of understanding” (9:5-6).

A much more thorough dissertation on the topic of fools can be found at bible.org

To Be or Not to Be

I was talking to my neighbor tonight about politics and the value of human life. She posited in so many words, that life is not worth suffering. In her mind, war is so evil it would be better for humanity to stop having children, to discontinue the species.

How can humanity be served by obliterating humanity? The kid in this video illustrates my point. Success and happiness in life is all about the attitude we approach it with and has very little to do with how much we suffer. Happy people are found in all walks of life the same as unhappy people. Many who suffer terrible setbacks are well adjusted, contributing members of society. Others in the very same circumstances would rather not have been born and some few would go so far as to end their lives because of their suffering disabilities.

I would find my neighbor's opinion about the value of human life appalling if it weren't for the fact that literally half of our culture believes in some variant the same as she does. That "Since we mercy kill animals that are suffering, why won't we offer the same 'service' to our loved ones?" There are elements of this mindset who believe wholeheartedly that this kid should have been killed when he lost his sight at the age of two to prevent his 'suffering' through life sightless. Granted, there are people suffering from terminal illnesses, in pain, and have no known chance of any recovery. So why not just let them die as they want to? I don't have all the answers to these terrible choices, but I do have huge concerns about 1. moving the line of decency. and 2. cutting short any opportunity to find that miracle cure for that person, or at least stabilizing their condition so that they don't continue to decline. The first concern is the biggest because it is detrimental to all of society. This week or this month or this decade, most of our culture would agree that a terminal illness is the point where we should draw that line. I don't happen to agree but the majority would.

Taking the evidence of abortion. For the sake of convenience, and personal choice, babies are being killed every day and this practice is sponsored by the state. Fifty years ago any mother and her 'doctor' would have been jailed by the state for the very same thing. So, fifty years into the future, will the state sanction killing two year olds because their mother didn't want them to suffer through blindness, or for themselves to have to raise a blind child? Will it be a viable choice for the parents of a mentally handicapped teenager? What about retirees without pensions who can't pay for their health care? What about homeless people? When we take upon ourselves the authority of God and start moving the line of decency, there is no authority left to correct, to say this far and no farther. No reason is required for abortions any longer because that line was moved by man. It went from 'only in the first trimester,' to 'in the first and second trimester,' and now at birth, the babies' brains are being sucked out while in the birth canal, and some are arguing that the option should remain open into the first year of life. If we move the line on other issues (mercy killing) in the future, no reason will be required for someone to decide who lives and who dies. Only that it falls within the parameters of what is best for.... who? the chooser?, the state? (gay marriage) will we be marrying two men and a chicken? two men and a six year old child? two brothers and their sister? a mother and her two sons? We scoff at the idea now, but we were scoffing at the idea of infanticide in the 1950's and 60's.

This isn't new, neither is abortion new to humanity. It was practiced as part of pagan religions during Biblical times and so was child sacrifice. One of their gods was a bronze statue with his arms held out in front of him. The statue was heated to glowing red and the mother or father would take their infant and set him or her in the arms of this glowing red statue and watch while their own child fried to death. Hitler and his Nazi's took the mentally challenged and had them gassed or shot. Other cultures killed the homeless. Without God, the line, the standard of conduct is as malleable as air. You can find some way to justify anything you want to do. We've already justified the murder of unborn children in our 'sophisticated' culture.

Back to my neighbor's mindset on life and suffering. All of life entails some measure of suffering. Birth is probably one of the most traumatic experiences of life. We struggle to learn to walk, falling often, and often experiencing pain in the process. Since it is painful to start life, to achieve the most basic of abilities, should we all stop trying, suicide because suffering is involved. Suffering is not pleasant, but it is one of the means by which we grow personally. Death and failure is much worse than suffering.

This is just as true culturally, should we not resist evil people who want to kill us? That would stop the war, that would stop our suffering, but it wouldn't stop the killing and the suffering of Muslims. They stone people to death, they kill each other in tribal and feudal wars.

'End all suffering' is the most foolish idea to come down the pike and it has saturated our culture. Of course there is suffering in life, and of course there is war. There will be war until God comes to take us out of here. Its in our nature. We have to fight our nature to achieve civilization, to have a community, to even have a family. It is in our nature to force our will on others. It is only by the understanding of every individual in a community, that we fight our natures to compete against other communities for survival. Through this achievement we have come to understand that cooperation is far more beneficial to everyone in a community than allowing our natures to rule us. We've learned when communities cooperate with each other to withstand bigger communities wills, cooperating communities benefit. The more people you have cooperating, the better the benefit. Finally, there are still communities in the world that still operate from the mentality of the stone age and would rather kill us or force us into their failing community structure via their religion.

We've come to regard this mindset as evil. Evil is as evil does. Killing and terrorizing to force your will on others is evil and that is exactly what the Islamo-Nazis are doing. Western culture did not first enter the Middle East with the idea that we are going to militarily change their culture and force our ways on them. We went over there as private citizens to do business in there culture. We were so successful at business that their culture began to change by virtue of their own success in that business environment. Some of them saw their own culture's change with successful trade as evil and violently opposed it. Threatening their own into submission, threatening the business people until they abandoned their trade markets, killing all business within their culture, they forced their will on their countrymen. Then, seeing all the other cultures growing and succeeding they decided all their failures were the fault of the West. Now, the ignorant people of the West are siding with the stone age people, believing every lie they tell. Our own media is an active party in the enemy's agenda to rule the world with this evil religion. Their holy book instructs them to lie to the infidel if that will empower them. I'm going to repost my article, "In Their Own Words" so you have easy access to the video of their most popular leaders speaking the truth about their intentions toward Western culture. They literally want to rule the world with their stone age power structure based on this evil, murdering religion.

If that's offensive to your politically correct indoctrination, consider this. In seven years and two wars, how many times have you heard moderate Muslims confess that global jihad is wrong? How many people of that faith stood behind the one making the confession? What percentage of the Muslim faith has spoken out against global jihad? I can tell you, because I've been listening and watching. If ten percent are actively involved with global jihad, not even 1/10 of one percent are saying a word against global jihad. Most speakers for Islam are excusing the jihadi actions or at best calling them mis-guided and acting against Western influence because it is corrupting their culture. I happen to agree that porn peddlers and homosexual activists are corrupting Muslims, they're corrupting Christians too. But Muslims aren't attacking porn peddlers or homosexuals. They name the corrupting influence as Christian Crusaders, harkening back 700 years to a period of retaliation for Muslim invasion into Europe. So the very things Christians are fighting in our own culture are the reasons this nation is being attacked by Muslims, not because of what Christians do or did. The abortions, the gay agenda, the porn peddling and on, and on So why does the Christian Right get the bad rap in this country? Because the liberal left doesn't want to admit their own responsibility for the mess we're in. They'd rather blame the military industrial complex, the oil industry, the stupid president who pulled off the biggest conspiracy ever by blowing up the World Trade Center, or Goldie Locks. I'm not sure how Goldie fits in the grand scheme of things but somehow, she is just as legitimate a target for blame as George Bush and the Christian Coalition.

The left no longer desire to obtain reason. The wisdom they seek is self serving. If knowledge requires that they accept blame, then knowledge is wrong. (revisionist history) If knowledge requires suffering and sacrifice to face threats, it isn't worth doing. If it is offensive, it is evil. And if knowledge of decency limits their desires, they aren't wrong, the limits are wrong.

Agents of Intolerant Tolerance

quote, "I recognize and celebrate that our country is founded upon Judeo- Christian values, and I have pledged my life to defend America and all her values, the values that have made us the noblest experiment in history. But public -- but political intolerance by any political party is neither a Judeo-Christian nor an American value. The political... (APPLAUSE)

The political tactics of division and slander are not our values, they are...

(APPLAUSE)

They are corrupting influences on religion and politics, and those who practice them in the name of religion or in the name of the Republican Party or in the name of America shame our faith, our party and our country.

(APPLAUSE)

Neither party should be defined by pandering to the outer reaches of American politics and the agents of intolerance, whether they be Louis Farrakhan or Al Sharpton on the left, or Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell on the right."

John McCain presidential campaign speech 2000

I am an agent of intolerance according to many including Presidential hopeful, John McCain. It used to be that I didn't think of myself that way. Now that I am taking bolder and broader stands for conservative values based on evidence of results, I get charged with being an agent of intolerance often. The most striking thing about this is that it requires a large measure of intolerance to make the charge in the first place. Nothing new here. In the same way judgments are made against me for judging, intolerance is expressed toward my intolerance in the name of tolerance. The first time I heard it, I was a little taken aback. But a two second reflection upon whatever issue I was debating and the words I'd chosen, and the way I'd presented them..... Yep, intolerant.

So what? Everybody is intolerant by necessity. Tolerance and intolerance requires judgment. Judgment is meaningless without intolerance. We don't tolerate stealing, cruelty, endangering others, slander,,,, you name an area of life and I'll demonstrate intolerance. These are called laws. More personally, we have intolerance for relatively minor things called infringements. A sociologically healthy person sets up boundaries and require others to respect them. This too, is a form of intolerance. For instance, I don't allow anybody I'm not intimate with to stand within a foot of me unless circumstances null my personal space. Something like riding a crowded bus or commuter train. If I observe someone acting aggressively or threateningly my personal space is extended until I feel I can react in a timely manner to counteract any threatening move made by that individual. In effect, I grow more intolerant the more insecure I feel.

I'm an individualist, I'm self reliant, I've finally grown up enough to take responsibility for my decisions, and stick to my commitments,,, and I expect others to do the same. I've come to understand that even though I am an individualist and self reliant, I don't live in a vacuum. What I do affects those around me and what others do, affects me. Since this is the case I have, and expect others to have, some common courtesy, some guidelines for behavior both public and private that benefit the whole society. These are healthy boundaries. I'm intolerant of gays getting equivalent benefits and legitimacy as a 'family' and of illegal immigrants getting equivalent benefits as citizens because, even though they may be nice people, their equivalence negates the sacrifices of those who live by the set boundaries of healthy societies. I'm intolerant of many social programs that hurt the very people they are intended to help. I'm intolerant of mob mentality which often undermines social structure. I'm intolerant of repeating failed attempts to fix self destructive people with big government programs that only support the self destructive behaviors we want fixed. I'm intolerant of government sponsored fixes for nonexistent threats like global warming while so many advocate ignoring real threats like global jihad. I'm intolerant of abusing language to the point that set definitions and expressions are muddled to near complete obfuscation. (Fascist)

Now that I've owned my intolerance and I believe most all conservatives would own their intolerance with me, let's see if any of the agents of intolerant tolerance (liberals and Democrats) will own their intolerance by recognizing their hypocrisy in labeling the rest of us intolerant. After all, how tolerant is it to attack conservatives for supporting established principals that are time proven while they insist on pouring ever increasing tax dollars into proven failure programs. More likely they will continue to obfuscate the term the same as they have fascism, xenophobe and a host of other labels used to dismiss any opponents' input not inline with their own.